AuctionBytes Home Page
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

eBay Sellers Do NOT Need An Auctioneer's License!!!!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AuctionBytes Forum Index -> Online Auction News Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
classicn



Joined: 16 Jul 2004
Posts: 407

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 8:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
A figurine that has a book value (book values are useless today) of say $500 with a true value of say $200 is put up for sale on eBay at $5.00 while others have the same item up at a starting price of $150.00..


This is not a good example of what is causing the soft market. If the situation was truly as discussed above, the auction would at the very least get bids from the other dealers, bidding it up to a reasonable price. If the price is lower than expected, then that is what it's worth. eBay is a buyer's market. I don't think licensing is the answer to this one.

classicn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
psmalls



Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 8:22 am    Post subject: are ebay sellers the only auctioneers? Reply with quote

Are automobile dealers/salesmen auctioneers? they place a fantasy (SRP) price on the vehicle and then accept or reject buyers bids, even for the same model with the same features. Perhaps eBay sellers could put a very high buy-it- now price on all items and accept the highest offer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
psmalls



Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 8:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Under this law eBay sellers aren't the only auctioneers. Aren't car dealers and agent salespeople auctioneers. They place a fantasy (SRP) price on the vehicle and then accept or reject buyers' offers. Perhaps we should all place a very high buy-it-now price on our eBey listings and then accept a reasonable (highest) offer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ranger



Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 156

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 1:38 pm    Post subject: post subject Reply with quote

Quote:
This is not a good example of what is causing the soft market. If the situation was truly as discussed above, the auction would at the very least get bids from the other dealers, bidding it up to a reasonable price. If the price is lower than expected, then that is what it's worth. eBay is a buyer's market. I don't think licensing is the answer to this one.


Well you say it isn't a good example but my example given was a general example. Factually speaking would you as a buyer bid on something that is $150 or the same thing that is $5.00? A no-brainer answer here. You also mention "If the situation was truly as discussed above, the auction would at the very least get bids from the other dealers, bidding it up to a reasonable price."

Actually that is something I have never seen. But then again I don't go around asking people if they are dealers.

Another example that actually happened to me:

I put up a widget starting at a buck and it got one bid for a buck and it was worth well over $80.00. Yes I did sell it for the buck. Yah wins some and yah loses some. But if this licensing idea was something that could possibly make people think before they low ball an item, then to me and many others it would be a great idea..

But the subject here is licensing not examples of others fine auctions.

IMO a license that is issued yearly is the way to go. And the cost of the license should be discussed at length before legislated..

I also believe that to keep eBay and lawmakers from running wild as they are now, an organization is desperately needed. eBay is no different than a local neighborhood in some city that has a "Merchant's Association"..

The merchants ass. wears many hats and what they do is sort of keep things in line by suggestion rather than by force. They do it by having regularly scheduled meetings to discuss issues that might not be good or be good for ALL..

The OAUA was formed originally with the right idea but of course it didn't take long before the doomsayers took over and Kaput went the OAUA..

IOW: The idea is to get a large enough group together to get the respect of eBay and make them listen to reason when they do frivolous things or raise their rates driving away the small mom and pops.

Maybe your way is the right way in your eye, but I look at the larger picture and think something has to be done.
BJ suggested it (licensing) and I agree..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BJGrolle



Joined: 25 Oct 2001
Posts: 816
Location: Ohio

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Regarding the issue of pricing, I can't see how requiring a license to sell on eBay would solve any low-balling problem. Putting aside the other issues...

During my telephone conversations with the government officials, they all admitted that it would be enforced on a complaint basis. There is no way for them to monitor who is selling on eBay in Ohio, etc.

And we all know that there are plenty of sellers who do this under-the-table: without collecting and remitting state sales tax or declaring their income on their tax returns.

Until the government can literally stop someone from sitting at their computer and putting up an auction on eBay, there is no way to stop the lowballing.

And yes, I've shared your frustration at times with the pricing. I don't deal in typically large $$$ myself, but it's frustrating to have 3 or 4 books listed by different sellers around the $10 range, then someone comes along with the next one at $2.99 or less. And guess which one gets the bid?

Licensing won't stop ignorance.
_________________
Brenda’s Bookshelf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dsteiner



Joined: 11 Jul 2001
Posts: 1305
Location: www.auctionbytes.com

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
During my telephone conversations with the government officials, they all admitted that it would be enforced on a complaint basis. There is no way for them to monitor who is selling on eBay in Ohio, etc.


Not to be contrarian, but this information is readily available on eBay. For example:
http://digbig.com/4cwdy
Addresses, phone numbers...and that's just one Zip Code prefix in Ohio.

In Illinois, I was told they've already collected the list of eBay Trading Assistants who have listed themselves in the TA directory.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
BJGrolle



Joined: 25 Oct 2001
Posts: 816
Location: Ohio

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, Trading Assistant info. is available. I was speaking more of the non-TA sellers.
_________________
Brenda’s Bookshelf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
hmh



Joined: 13 Mar 2002
Posts: 96

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 8:00 pm    Post subject: LICENSE Reply with quote

Brenda,
Have you heard anything more about state bill 209. I just got done trying trying to call one of the state reps cant get thru evenings are bad.Either that or they dont want to talk to me.
I have a vendors license to resell items in ohio I believe thats all the licensing I should need. take care,john
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
spectator



Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:10 pm    Post subject: I think TA's should be licensed...and already ARE! Reply with quote

In CA, TAs narrowly escape secondhand dealer status by claiming an exemption that quite honestly, is a loophole, and completely inconsistent with the intent of the law.

In a previous post (http://www.auctionbytes.com/forum/phpBB/viewtopic.php?p=6413252&highlight=#6413252) I brought this to the attention of the forums with no (meaningful) response.

I have been ACTIVELY researching this issue for months and I have a few preliminary findings. (beyond what I already wrote)

#1 eBay officially considers itself a VENUE,

#2 eBay does not consider itself an auctioneer.

#3 TAs are typically defined as “auction houses.” If a TA takes physical possession an item for the purpose of auctioning, the TA is considered an auction house.

#4 TAs are auctioneers. TAs choose which bids to accept (private auction) and which to reject. TAs usually set the starting price. TAs call out the items via written descriptions and html.


In the state of CA, a secondhand dealer is FORMALLY defined as:

21626. (a) A "secondhand dealer," as used in this article, means and includes any person, copartnership, firm, or corporation whose business includes buying, selling, trading, taking in pawn, accepting for sale on consignment, accepting for auctioning, or auctioning secondhand tangible personal property.

The law squarely brands a TA as a secondhand dealer and therefore their business is subject to the governing legislation.

However, TA’s claim this exemption:

21626.5. "Secondhand dealer," as used in this article, does not include either of the following:
(a) Any person who performs the services of an auctioneer for a fee or salary.


This exception is intended to pertain to a hired auctioneer…the kind of “for hire” fellow who travels around the world using his cool voice, and lightning fast talking skills to add to the feel of an auction. In my opinion, to claim that this exception applies to TAs and therefore precludes all the other clauses is not in the spirit of the legislation.

This exemption is not intended to apply to somebody who
#1 “accepts for sale on consignment”
#2 “accepts for auctioning” and
#3 [is engaged in] auctioning secondhand tangible personal property.
TAs, in my opinion, are VERY SPECIFICALLY governed by this legislation.

The laws are put in place TO PROTECT CITIZENS FROM THE SALE OF STOLEN MERCHANDIZE, AND TO AID LAW ENFORCEMENT IN RECOVERING STOLEN ITEMS. It’s not some lame frivolous tax. Its about $50 per year, and it forces you to register your goods with the police. It’s a pain.

I do it on everything I am supposed to, and I wait when I am supposed to. For the other TAs who don’t follow these laws, I encourage you to be more ethical in your businesses. Morality is good.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
classicn



Joined: 16 Jul 2004
Posts: 407

PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 7:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
And yes, I've shared your frustration at times with the pricing. I don't deal in typically large $$$ myself, but it's frustrating to have 3 or 4 books listed by different sellers around the $10 range, then someone comes along with the next one at $2.99 or less. And guess which one gets the bid?

Licensing won't stop ignorance.


I would say licensing won't stop capitalism. This is more for ranger than for BJ.. Frustrating as it may be, the above is how business works. I have a product that I was selling like hotcakes for $24.99. 90% of that was profit. Months later, another seller is offering the same sort of thing for $2.00. He's forgoing the profit on this one to drive sales of other things. I've moved on. I'm not listing it any more because it's not worth it to me. Enforcing licensing on businesses is not going to eliminate this sort of thing.

Quote:
But if this licensing idea was something that could possibly make people think before they low ball an item, then to me and many others it would be a great idea..


Why would this make people think? All this would do would make people raise prices to cover the cost of licensure.

The rule to remember is that the value of an item is what someone will actually pay for it. And yes, I'd bid on the $5.00 item, silly rabbit. The seller listing at $5.00 is buying the extra bids with the risk they are taking for listing it low. In the case you cited, the risk bit back. Also take into consideration that they both bought the item for $20.00. The $150 seller wants to make X profit. The $5.00 seller would be happy with $25.00, and may get it. Should we punish him for not needing so much profit? Legislating against competition is a stalling practice, not a business practice. Monopolies and trusts I can see, but lowball sellers? Give me a break. We could license garage salers too, but then neither seller would have been able to buy the book and resell it at a profit.

classicn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BJGrolle



Joined: 25 Oct 2001
Posts: 816
Location: Ohio

PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 7:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

John, I haven't heard any more about it. From what I've read on various boards, lots of people are trying to call their reps and/or Senator Mumper's office. Some are getting through.

Trust me, I'm keeping tabs on the situation.
_________________
Brenda’s Bookshelf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bobcat1804



Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 9:55 am    Post subject: My email to Sen. Mumper Reply with quote

BJ-

Here's the email I sent to Sen. Mumper's office yesterday (cc: to the senator in my district). The bottom line is that this mess with auctioneer licensing is delaying my decision to open a drop-off store. I don't want to throw my money away by finding out that I won't be able to do business for a year while I serve an apprenticeship:

Dear Senator Mumper:

My name is xxxxxxx. I have recently been awarded a franchise from xxxxxxx, an eBay drop-off store franchisor (www.xxxxxxx.com). I plan to open the first xxxxxxx-area xxxxxxx store within the next two months. I am writing in regards to the legislation you authored that pertains to online auctions (http://money.cnn.com/2005/03/07/technology/ohio_ebay/index.htm). From the articles I've read on this legislation, the state auction license would require the following:

1.) A cost of $200 and posting a $50,000 bond
2.) A one-year apprenticeship to a licensed auctioneer
3.) Acting as a bid-caller in 12 auctions
4.) Attending an approved auction school
5.) Passing a written and oral exam

I believe that regulation of our industry is, by-and-large, a positive notion. It can be used to separate the legitimate businesses from the fly-by-night operations. With that in mind, I have no problem with neither the $200 license fee, nor the $50,000 bond (the bond is a very good safeguard for consumers). However, I do take issue with the apprenticeship requirements, auction school attendance, and the examination requirements.

As the owner of an eBay drop-off store, I will be acting as a technical consultant, not an auctioneer. My job duties will consist of the following: Researching pricing for an item based on recent eBay auctions; taking digital photographs of said item, writing an accurate description of the item, creating an eBay listing for the item, answering any questions about the item from prospective bidders, and finally, packing and shipping the item to the winning bidder once the auction has closed.

None of my job responsibilities include actually auctioning off the item. That responsibility falls upon eBay itself. The eBay web site, along with the software that powers it, takes care of the actual auction process. Because my business will not entail conducting auctions of any sort, I do not believe I should be subject to the bulk of the requirements that your legislation sets forth.

I hope I was able to give you some insight into the eBay drop-off store industry and how it differs from the job of an auctioneer. An examination process tailored specifically for the eBay drop-off store industry might be appropriate for regulatory purposes, but including our business under the umbrella of this general auctioneer legislation is not. I would ask that you take another look at this legislation and make revisions that would remove any undue constraints on the eBay drop-off store industry. Thank you.

Sincerely,

xxxxxxx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BJGrolle



Joined: 25 Oct 2001
Posts: 816
Location: Ohio

PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bobcat, that is a very nice letter! Professional and to the point.

I particularly like the paragraph where you explain how eBay actually works.

My efforts to explain the same fell on deaf ears, but that was before I got the media involved. If more and more people call their state reps on this, send emails, etc., it keeps the pressure on and the issue in the forefront so it cannot be swept under the carpet.

Yesterday, someone posted at OTWA that the news made CNN! They did a rewrite of the articles floating around - it's the first article I've seen originating out of New York.

Here is a link to it:

http://money.cnn.com/2005/03/07/technology/ohio_ebay/
_________________
Brenda’s Bookshelf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ranger



Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 156

PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:29 pm    Post subject: post subject Reply with quote

Quote:
Enforcing licensing on businesses is not going to eliminate this sort of thing.

Quote:
But if this licensing idea was something that could possibly make people think before they low ball an item, then to me and many others it would be a great idea..


I should have explained myself a bit more. What I meant by the above is that by making people buy a license, hopefuilly it would eliminate the people who do this low-balling thing.

Low-balling attracts bidders but most of the time I see it hurts the market because the item usually never gets to what we as experienced dealers think it is worth.

There was an interesting article in the Farm and Dairy News Auction section of this week. It was the well known Harry Rinker column where he said, "Want a real price check? You'll find it on eBay..."

He said in part, that in a price guide from just last year, the price on the item in question was listed as $300.00 yet he looked them up on eBay and they are getting no bids or around $100.00, yet he priced the same item in the secondary resale market and it was averaging $225.00 per.

How true is this and why? It is very true and the reason is, because what was once considered rare or valuable due to scarcity is now found many times in abundance on eBay...
This alone helped make the market a soft place, yet has anyone gone into an antique mall lately?

The prices are most times well over published book prices.
I laugh my butt off when I go to these malls and see it. In my travels when I go back a year later or more, I see the same items still there and at the same price making me think that most of these Antique Malls are nothing more than a museum.

In fact at a mall in Ohio we saw a Hummel that had a book price of over $650 for sale at $400. Unfortunately it was repaired poorly and you could see the piece was glued together in several places. IMO something that is glued like this piece was is practically worthless. In fact most professional dealers would say that most, but not all, items that are repaired have little or no value. Especially since most times you can find it on eBay in near mint condition for a bargain price.

But getting back to the subject... Some type of business licensing of people IMO is the way to stop some of these people whose brain is short a few blood vessels from doing what they do to make the market as soft as it is.

Better yet where do they get items that are rare or expensive for such bargain prices that they can sell it on eBay for the so called low-ball price?

I attend many auctions and have seen people buy a widget for $99.00 then, list it on eBay for $5.00 and watch it sell for $20.00.. DUH!!! When will they learn? Probably never.

At one time on eBay you could start an item at 1¢ or 99¢ and get a true value for it, but those days are gone, maybe forever... This thanks to people who never research their items.

I am against any further fees such as license fees but if it makes people stop selling things at these low-ball prices I would gladly fork over a few more fishnagles once a year.

I am 100% against making sellers get an auctioneers license because that is just plain dumb dumb dumb..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bobcat1804



Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:54 pm    Post subject: Response from Sen. Mumper's legislative aide Reply with quote

My attorney just forwarded me an email from the legislative aide of Ohio State Sen. Jim Hughes. Here is an excerpt from that message:

"I have also spoken with Senator Mumper's legislative aide who in our conversation indicated that a new bill is being drafted and possibly introduced today or tomorrow to address the "unforeseen consequences" caused by SB 209- specifically the e-Bay situation."

As soon as I receive word on exactly what those changes might be, I will post again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AuctionBytes Forum Index -> Online Auction News Forum All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Home
Auction News
Archives
Forums
Yellow Pages

Our Writers
Write For Us
Press
Advertising
About Us
Link To Us



Copyright 1999-2009 Steiner Associates LLC

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group